Tuesday, January 29, 2008

I've been humbled

While I did poke fun at Bush a few posts ago, this quote from last nights SotU address proved that humor can poke through the darkness.

He also pushed Congress to extend his tax cuts, which are to expire in 2010, and said allowing them to lapse would mean higher tax bills for 116 million American taxpayers. For those who say they're willing to pay more, Bush said, "I welcome their enthusiasm, and I am pleased to report that the IRS accepts both checks and money orders." www.ksl.com

I for one am tired of others telling me that I need to pay for their pet government programs. If they want it, let them contribute extra with a specification to the program they want funded. I believe in basic government services and not "bridges to nowhere".

Well anyway with respect to my lack of motorcycle posts I will add this picture so that you can now see what I'm currently lusting after.




Tuesday, January 22, 2008

A Dark Day

FIRST A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT: COLBY WHERE ARE YOU???

I'm sure everyone will soon hear of how the Fed is saving the economy by reducing interest rates by 3/4%. The news will go on and on about how this is a good thing and the ship will soon right itself. To use one of my more recently blogged expressions "Um, no". When the Fed lowers SHORT TERM INTERBANK interest rates eight days before its next meeting, it's NOT good. This is a sign of a drastic action for a desperate situation.

The public rarely knows what is the new, in vogue fear of Wall Street until after its happened. From what I have read (you never know the new fear unless you shift through the latest public fear to find the next one. You do this by reading several articles and picking up on the two or three sentences which coincide with the other articles. Now if I was any good with this I would be blogging from my beach house on Maui/Bali/Perth/Newport Beach/my own island etc. so take this with the knowledge that I can only guess as I'm an interested student and spectator) the latest fear is counter-party risk.

This type of risk is associated with the different parties subscribing to a financial instrument. Take a vanilla swap for instance. Two "people" Mike and Fred agree to pay each other a cash flow based on the USA short term interest rate (there are many good and valid reasons for doing this, but I won't bore you with the details). Mike has lost A LOT of money betting (yes, gambling) on Ma and Pa Kettles mortgage and can not pay Fred his cash flow. This is counter party risk. Usually the counter party risk in nominal if you contract with solid individuals with solid track records, credit, reserves, etc., but now with even the largest, supposedly secure financial institutions having difficulties and being "forced" (BofA) (quotation mark alert ;) ) to merge with severely troubled (Countrywide) mortgage companies, the balance sheets of these companies are increasingly under threat.

This is where counter party risk comes in. The vanilla swap contract that Mike and Fred entered into has a monetary value (asset) based upon the cash flows. If Mike or Fred (counter parties, Mike in this case) can not pay their part, the swap no longer has any significant value and is no longer an asset to the solvent(?) holder of the other side of the swap. Fred now takes a hit to his revenue (lack of cash flow payments from Mike) and to his balance sheet (the swap is no longer an asset and has to be removed from the asset side of the balance sheet). The problem now is whether Fred used this asset (the swap contract) to back (as collateral) a loan on his helicopter. If Fred did and Helicopter Lending Inc. finds out that this collateral is no longer worth anything then it will ask/demand/threaten Fred to back the loan with CASH. If Fred doesn't have the cash, he then defaults along with Mike. This scenario then dominoes throughout the financial industry and now the Fred's and Mike's of the world sell off contracts for pennies on the dollar (if they can find someone to buy them) to raise cash to back their other obligations. This further degrades the balance sheet as once lofty value assets are replaced with lower value cash or other financial instruments. If the balance sheet becomes unbalanced and companies run afoul of financial regulations and loan covenants, panic ensues. This is bad for everyone as institutions hoard cash to meet obligations or regulations, stop lending and consumers stop buying. This is the new fear on Wall Street.

To tie these two things together (yes I think they are related) the Fed may have lowered rates to help the financial institutions re balance their capital needs without resorting to a massive sell off of financial instrument assets. Whether this works or not is dependent upon the suckers that are in the barrel. If you think this rate reduction was to help you or me directly (we may be helped by not having our economy melt down), sorry, think again.

To tie this to a previous post about the value of the dollar, as interest rates decrease, the value of the dollar compared to other currencies decreases. This makes it more expensive to travel and increases the price of commodities like oil. Reducing interest rates also makes inflation likely higher.

Well till next time.

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Ummmmm OK

Very few articles I read have as much "fun" per line as this Bloomberg article. Now you may ask yourself "where is the fun?", believe me its there.

First: ``OPEC should understand that if they can put more supply on the market, it would be help,'' Bush said in an interview with reporters traveling with him in the Middle East. ``I realize there is not a lot of excess capacity in the marketplace.'' Now calling on OPEC to raise output to help out our economy, which of course is just fine and dandy (just ask any politician in power), is laughable. OPEC has lost its ability to control the price and supply of oil. China and India are on the brink of a huge explosion in oil demand. The worlds oil suppliers are producing like crazy to get that $95 a barrel oil to market. The Dollar is losing value and has not yet hit bottom (when the Fed reduces interest rates, the Dollar falls in value). Oil is priced in dollars. No one wants a useless currency, so the producers need more of it to offset the risk of the dollar being worth less in the present and future. It all adds up to a bad situation. Add in the credit market squeeze and the prospects are frightening. The difference between the 70's and 80's oil shocks and this one is that this is demand driven whereas the earlier shocks were supply driven. Oh an FYI. The "extra" 2 million barrels a day that Saudi Arabia supposedly has is wax, yes black/brown waxy sludge which is only good for producing low quality petroleum based products if anything at all, NOT gasoline. No one wants this sludge because of its low utility and high cost to refine and transport.

Next: Bush ``oil prices are very high, which is tough on our economy,''. Well um duh!

Next: Bush also reiterated that he remains optimistic about the U.S. economy, though he continues to watch for warning signs. ``We're going to watch very carefully,'' he said. -- Um like the price of oil going through the roof, the dollars demise, the current recession, housing, huge/major/colossal/gargantuan counter-party risk in the banking sector, hidden inflation (FYI the gov. decides what it includes in the inflation number which it reports. If it doesn't like a factor, it can discount that factor or remove it completely. Processes are in place so that it can't just wily nilly the numbers each time, but it can change policy to impact the number that is reported. Food and fuel costs were excluded some years ago because the prices were too volatile and swung the inflation number back and forth. I don't know about you but after my house payment, our next biggest monthly expenditures are Food and Fuel.), negative savings rates, etc. I may not be the smartest cookie in the jar but these seem like pretty good warning signs of an impending doom.

Next: In the interview with reporters, Bush also said he reassured Arab allies during his trip that the U.S. still views Iran as a threat, in spite of the new intelligence report that said Iran stopped its active nuclear program in 2003.

``I defended the intelligence community but I made it clear that they are an independent agency,'' Bush said. ``They come to conclusions separate from what I may or may not want.''

I found this to be the most "fun" of all. Did Bush want Iran to continue its nuclear program. Why? I have always been uneasy about the saber rattling concerning Iran and this just makes it worse. I always hoped (my Pollyanna side showing through) that intelligence communities were searching for the truth and not something that fit a specified pre-determined scenario. In this case maybe, just maybe, they did that.

By the way, Iran has a huge youth segment (20 to 25 year olds) who don't believe in the current regime. They don't hate the West and see their country being dragged down through bad policy and rhetoric. Iran will solve its own problems in time.

By the way part two :). This whole "Iranian fast boat" incident smells funny to me. The administration made a big deal out of something the financial markets took in stride. To me this has happened before and will happen again. Always take in the whole picture, political/financial (follow the money)/societal, of something that is reported. If this had not happened before or been known by the markets to have occurred before, then the price of oil would have exploded; it didn't, it decreased by the close of the day. The market knew these things happened and didn't see this incident as anything out of the ordinary. When the sun doesn't quite shine the right way on a oil rig in the North Sea, traders use that to push up the price of oil, but a supposedly one time, never happened before, immediate threat to the US Navy registers a daily price drop, I smell political propaganda, fear mongering, and grandstanding.

Now just to clarify, I'm not a conspiracy guru, nor am I worried the gov. is spying on me, nor am I a far right/left winger, nor am I crazy (though that is a nickname I have been given), I'm independent and side with the idea that makes the most sense to me. To me the US is on never before experienced ground. We have the makings of a financial death spiral brewing, it would take extraordinary circumstances to make that happen, but the brew is closer to fruition than I've ever known it. We have political gridlock and wildly out of touch politicians running things. Nothing screws up solid business like a politician and when the two combine nothing good can come. For full disclosure, I have looked at living in other countries and suggest you peruse where you might want to live. My advise, chose somewhere which has rich mineral deposits, access to nearby growing markets, a solid workforce, and a stable government. Minerals are a good hedge against political and financial uncertainty. Till next time keep to the sunny side of life :)




Monday, January 14, 2008

Wow, what a long time!

A month and a week. Thats how long its been since I last wrote anything. Well now that the holidays are over, the snow is on the ground and the sicknesses have taken over the house, maybe I'll remember to write. Who knows?

What I'm reading now:
Infectious Greed: How Deceit and Risk Corrupted the Financial Markets
Infectious Greed: How Deceit and Risk Corrupted the Financial Markets
by Frank Partnoy

What I just finished watching:


Long Way Down
Ewen and Charlie go from the top of Scotland to Cape Town SA on BMW Motorcycles (Thanks Aunt Nell!!!)